My Photo

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Blog powered by TypePad

Search Me!

  • Google

    www
    xinkaishi

Analyze Me!

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

FT: Ovation in Pyongyang is music to US ears

Excerpt

Download new_york_philharmonic_pyongyang_arirang.wmv

...New York Philharmonic's emotionally charged debut performance in Pyongyang....The real magic came last.

" 'Arirang', 'Arirang'," the North Koreans whispered to each other as the violins played the opening notes. The people in the second and third circles leant forward to watch over the ledge. The piccolo peeped the tune, the violins sang languidly....Even as the musicians left the stage, the applause continued for several minutes. As Mr Maazel and the concert master returned to the empty stage, some North Koreans applauded over their heads.

"It seemed they were being so friendly with us through the music," said one North Korean woman in a peach-coloured traditional dress, white handkerchief in her hand. "My favourite was 'Arirang'. I felt very moved."

[clip attached]

===

Ovation in Pyongyang is music to US ears

By Anna Fifield in Pyongyang

Published: February 27 2008 02:00 | Last updated: February 27 2008 02:00

The final strains of "Arirang", the heart-rending Korean folk song about separation, had not even ended when the thumping applause started filling the East Pyongyang Grand Theatre last night.

Middle-aged men with purple-tinted glasses and women in traditional dress, visiting South Korean sponsors and Manhattan matrons in fur, they all leapt to their feet to celebrate the New York Philharmonic's emotionally charged debut performance in Pyongyang.

It felt like history.

Expectations were high for this trip, where the US's most prestigious orchestra went to a country founded on hatred of America. Just as cultural exchanges helped transform the US's relationship with China and the Soviet Union, some hoped this would be the beginning of warmer relations, and perhaps even détente, with North Korea. But few could have dared to hope the performance would have been so well received.

From the start, the concert was exceptional. On a stage flanked by North Korean and US flags, the orchestra played "Aegukga", the North Korean national anthem, and the "Star Spangled Banner". This would have been unthinkable 18 months ago.

The New York Phil moved on to Dvorak's New World Symphony . The applause was the kind of applause the audience might usually give at a revolutionary opera about agricultural production. The mood changed when Lorin Maazel, music director, turned to introduce the next piece. "It is written by America's most well-known composer and it's called An American in Paris ," he explained. "Some day a composer might write a work entitled Americans in Pyongyang."

The audience broke out into rapturous applause. The ice was broken. If this concert precipitates a thaw, it started here.

Unlike with the Dvorak symphony, the members of the audience seemed to respond to the Gershwin piece. Indeed, Dvorak and the like are de rigeur in North Korea, but Gershwin is something else. The audience as a whole suddenly seemed much more engaged.

Many North Koreans were quick to join the standing ovation. And then the fireworks began. For the encore, the orchestra played Leonard Bernstein's Candide , after which Mr Maazel explained the orchestra's special attachment to its former conductor.

"Imagine Maestro Bernstein coming back and conducting once more," Mr Maazel almost whispered. "Maestro, do me a favour," he said in Korean, backing off the stage to leave the orchestra to play Bizet's Farandole without him.

The sight of the empty green dais was spinetingling, especially given the historical connotations: Bernstein led the Phil to the Soviet Union in 1959.

The real magic came last.

" 'Arirang', 'Arirang'," the North Koreans whispered to each other as the violins played the opening notes. The people in the second and third circles leant forward to watch over the ledge. The piccolo peeped the tune, the violins sang languidly.

As the piece closed, the applause was electric. And it was put on full display something rarely seen in North Korea: spontaneity.

The entire audience was on its feet, but this time it was not just the women in traditional dress who were smiling, it was the previously implacable bureaucrats too. They clapped, as the orchestra bowed.

Even as the musicians left the stage, the applause continued for several minutes. As Mr Maazel and the concert master returned to the empty stage, some North Koreans applauded over their heads.

"It seemed they were being so friendly with us through the music," said one North Korean woman in a peach-coloured traditional dress, white handkerchief in her hand. "My favourite was 'Arirang'. I felt very moved."

Mr Maazel was also clearly moved. "It was a stunning, stunning reaction. We haven't seen that kind of enthusiastic reaction in a long time, and we have had some very successful concerts," he said after the concert. "When we saw that very enthusiastic reaction, we thought that maybe it was mission accomplished."

Philharmonic Agrees to Play in North Korea

Jennifer Taylor for The New York Times

Lorin Maazel, the music director of the New York Philharmonic, conducted the orchestra in September.

          
      
       
Article Tools Sponsored By
       
      
   
 
Published: December 10, 2007
 

Adding a cultural wrinkle to the diplomatic engagement between the United States and North Korea, the New York Philharmonic plans  to visit Pyongyang, the North Korean capital, in February, taking the legacy of Beethoven, Bach and Bernstein to one of the world’s most isolated nations.

      

The trip, at the invitation of North Korea, will be the first significant cultural visit by Americans to that country, and it comes as the United States is offering the possibility of warmer ties with a country that President Bush once consigned to the “axis of evil.”

“We haven’t even had Ping-Pong diplomacy with these people,” said Ambassador Christopher R. Hill, the Bush administration’s main diplomat for negotiations with North Korea and the assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs.

Just last week Mr. Bush sent a letter to Kim Jong-il, North Korea’s leader, suggesting that ties would improve if North Korea fully disclosed all nuclear programs and got rid of its nuclear weapons. Conservatives have criticized the Bush administration for engaging with North Korea when it has violated nuclear promises, and in the face of recent intelligence indicating its possible assistance to Syria in beginning work on a reactor.

State Department officials said the orchestra’s invitation from North Korea and its acceptance represented a potential opening in that Communist nation’s relationship with the outside world, and a softening of its unrelenting anti-United States propaganda.

“It would signal that North Korea is beginning to come out of its shell, which everyone understands is a long-term process,” Mr. Hill said. “It does represent a shift in how they view us, and it’s the sort of shift that can be helpful as we go forward in nuclear weapons negotiations.”

The Philharmonic’s trip, which has generated some controversy among orchestra musicians and commentators, will follow a venerable line of groundbreaking orchestra tours that have played a role in diplomacy, the most famous one, perhaps, taking place in 1973, when the Philadelphia Orchestra traveled to China soon after President Nixon’s historic visit and amid what came to be known as Ping-Pong diplomacy. In 1956 the Boston Symphony was the first major American orchestra to travel to the Soviet Union. The New York Philharmonic, under Leonard Bernstein, went three years later.

Of the Philharmonic’s excursion, Mr. Hill said, “I hope it will be looked back upon as an event that helped bring that country back into the world.”

The Philharmonic, led by its music director, Lorin Maazel, has been considering the visit since an invitation arrived by fax in August. It was a typed letter from the North Korean culture ministry, in English, accompanied by a cover letter from a private individual in California who said he was acting as an intermediary. The orchestra had the invitation authenticated by the State Department, which has provided advice and help in negotiating the terms of the visit. Mr. Hill said that he did not know how the invitation had come about. But its timing was significant, after a series of breakthroughs in a decade-long effort to have North Korea halt its nuclear program.

In February North Korea agreed to shut down its main reactor in exchange for economic aid and other inducements. The reactor was switched off in July, a month before the invitation. And in September the Bush administration said that North Korea had agreed to disable its main nuclear fuel plant and give an accounting of its nuclear facilities, fuel and weapons by the end of the year. Progress toward the Philharmonic’s visit accelerated when orchestra executives and a State Department official visited Pyongyang in October.

The final major logistical pieces of the concert fell into place late last week, after a visit to Seoul, the capital of South Korea, by Zarin Mehta, the orchestra’s president. The Philharmonic’s spokesman, Eric Latzky, confirmed that the trip was on, but he declined to discuss details publicly until a news conference at Avery Fisher Hall tomorrow, when it is to be formally announced.

Mr. Hill, who was in Pyongyang last week delivering Mr. Bush’s letter and inspecting nuclear facilities, said he planned to attend the news conference. He has spoken privately to the orchestra members. Even more surprising, the Philharmonic said that Pak Kil-yon, North Korea’s representative to the United Nations, would also attend, a rare public appearance by a North Korean diplomat. Mr. Hill said he believed that the conditions sought by the Philharmonic had been met. They included the presence of foreign journalists; a nationwide broadcast to ensure that not just a small elite would hear the concert; acoustical adjustments to the East Pyongyang Grand Theater; an assurance that the eight Philharmonic members of Korean origin would not encounter difficulties; and that the orchestra could play “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

Once the orchestra members had given their approval, the major stumbling block became transportation. The orchestra, staff members and journalists are expected to number about 250. A plane that can also carry the many large instruments had to be found. Asiana Airlines, a South Korean carrier, offered such a plane, provided that financing could be secured, said Evans Revere, a former senior United States diplomat who is president of the Korea Society, which helped plan the visit.

MBC, one of three main broadcasters in South Korea, offered to pay for the charter in exchange for the rights to broadcast an extra concert by the Philharmonic in Seoul on its return from Pyongyang, Mr. Revere said.

“The balance that’s being achieved here is pretty nifty,” he said. “It’s a nice message being sent to the peninsula that the premier American orchestra is performing in both capitals within hours of each other.”

One of the remaining loose ends is the procurement of climate-controlled trucks to transport instruments to and from the airport. One possibility is arranging for South Korean trucks to be driven across the border. The North Korean government can be unpredictable, and there is always the possibility that the visit could be derailed.

The concert is planned for Feb. 26 at the end of a previously planned tour in China. The orchestra is expected to stay in Pyongyang for two nights, with some teaching and a ceremonial dinner thrown in.

Some questions have been raised about the appropriateness of visiting a country run by one of the world’s most repressive governments. North Korea’s policies have been blamed in part for the famine-related starvation of perhaps two million people and it confines hundreds of thousands of people in labor camps.

If the orchestra goes to Pyongyang, “it will be doing little more than participating in a puppet show whose purpose is to lend legitimacy to a despicable regime,” Terry Teachout, an arts critic and blogger, wrote on the online opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal in late October.

Richard V. Allen, a national security adviser to President Ronald Reagan, and Chuck Downs — both board members of the United States Committee for Human Rights in North Korea — made a similar point on Oct. 28 on the Op-Ed page of The New York Times. “It would be a mistake to hand Kim Jong-il a propaganda coup,” they wrote.

Mr. Hill acknowledged that “in a very theoretical way” any kind of opening lends legitimacy to the North Korean government. “But not opening up has not had any positive effect in bringing North Korea out of its shell,” he said.

Mr. Latzky declined to discuss the concert program, but orchestra officials have said from the beginning that it would probably include American music.

BT: Riding a maritime growth wave

              
Published February 27, 2008
ASIA PACIFIC MARITIME 2008
Riding a maritime growth wave

Singapore has the reputation, infrastructure and the right policies to tap the Asian shipping boom, reports VINCENT WEE

 

       

WITH the Asia-Pacific region accounting for almost 40 per cent of the global maritime market, according to a recent survey by business intelligence consultancy Fusion Consulting, Asia, there is little doubt that the region plays a prominent part in the industry, and this is set to grow in the years ahead. Fusion also forecasts the market will grow at an annual rate of 7 per cent till 2010.

     
Leading the way: The Port of Singapore maintained its place as the top transhipment port, handling some 27.9 million TEUs last year

The boom in Asian shipping has also drawn attention to the Asia-Pacific. Fusion estimates that merchant shipping in the region accounted for 39 per cent of the global total in 2006 and is set to grow at 8 per cent a year till 2010.

The maritime engineering, ports and terminals and offshore businesses are also huge, making up 63 per cent, 42 per cent and 23 per cent of the global market respectively. The offshore market especially is set to grow at 8 per cent annually.

Countries like China are starting to see more investments and business in industries like shipbuilding and repair as ship owners seek to take advantage of still available building slots and labour costs 10 to 20 times lower than traditional powerhouses Japan and South Korea.

China plans to boost its shipbuilding capacity to 40 million tonnes by 2010, a three-fold increase over 2005, the Fusion report said.

Asia's rising prominence has also led to an increasing realisation among shipping companies outside Asia that they need to have a presence here and a separate strategy for the region as well.

 
 

Busy shipyards

Overall, the Asia-Pacific's US$43 billion shipbuilding industry enjoys a 66 per cent global market share, the consultancy's estimates show. The key beneficiary of the current boom has been South Korea (with over 40 per cent of global market share), which has orders worth over US$12 billion placed in the first quarter of last year alone and has yards full till 2010.

However China (15 per cent) is fast catching up with Korea and has secured 56.6 per cent of the total contracts in the same period for bulk carriers and smaller tankers to be delivered by 2009.

Growth for port operations and services is expected to be widespread in the region as well with a 6 per cent annual growth rate expected to take its share of the global pie up to 44 per cent or US$54 billion by 2010, Fusion said. The main areas of growth in ports and terminals are expected in China, India and Korea. By 2011, Asia is expected to handle 206 million twenty-foot units (TEU) including 64 million TEUs in transhipment.

Singapore, in particular, has benefited from the growth in the industry. The Republic is home to more than 4,400 shipping and maritime-related companies employing some 100,000 people, offering a full range of services.

The Port of Singapore maintained its place as top transhipment port, handling some 27.9 million TEUs last year. Singapore was also the leading bunker port, with bunker sales passing the 30 million tonnes mark to hit 31.5 million tonnes.

Announcing the 2007 port figures at a Singapore Maritime Foundation function earlier this year, Transport Minister Raymond Lim said: '2007 was also a good year of growth for the rest of Singapore's maritime cluster, bolstering Singapore's reputation as an International Maritime Centre.'

The Singapore Registry of Ships grew by 13.8 per cent to hit 39.6 million gross tonnes while the Approved International Shipping Enterprise (AIS) scheme attracted 18 new international shipping companies during the year, bringing the total number operating here to nearly 100, he said.

Mr Lim added that the year also saw new listings of foreign shipping companies as well as two new shipping trusts on the stock exchange. Companies like North of England P&I Club, Scorpio Ship Management and HypoVereinsbank are either establishing new offices or substantially expanding their operations here.

Asia's rising prominence has also led to an increasing realisation among shipping companies outside Asia that they need to have a presence here and a separate strategy for the region as well.

Singapore is well positioned to take advantage of this with its established status as a global port along with all the other supporting infrastructure in the maritime cluster.

The government is also supportive of the industry with several measures introduced to support the maritime cluster. A favourable tax regime is in place to provide incentives for companies to locate here - the AIS and Approved Shipping Logistics Enterprise Scheme and double tax, bilateral shipping and free trade agreements all help reduce costs for companies.

Looking into the future, further support has been offered in the current Budget. The Maritime Finance Incentive will be enhanced from April 1 to include container leasing activity and to allow partnerships also to enjoy the incentive.

Container investment enterprises will enjoy a concessionary tax rate of either 5 per cent or 10 per cent on all onshore and offshore container leasing income, depending on their commitments. A container investment manager will enjoy a 10 per cent concessionary tax rate on its management fee income.

The Maritime Finance Incentive (MFI) scheme was introduced in February 2006 to promote alternative ship finance structures, such as ship leasing companies and shipping trusts, by providing tax exemption for ship investment vehicles and a concessionary tax rate.

Tax certainty was also extended for another five years to shipping companies on gains from the disposal of their vessels and with the inclusion of forex and hedging gains as qualifying income under the Singapore flag or AIS schemes.

The growth of the maritime industry in the region is undeniable and Singapore, with its established reputation as a maritime centre and its modern infrastructure, is taking full advantage of it.

 

BT: He'll release your mind from captivity

   
Profile      
     
Published February 29, 2008
He'll release your mind from captivity

In the wake of Ah Meng's death, CHEAH UI-HOON catches up with Bernard Harrison to find out what the former zoo chief has been up to

 

     

THE Night Safari might be 12 years old, but former zoo chief Bernard Harrison's execution of the idea - the first of its kind in the world - still resonates in creative circles. That, and his championing of creativity.

     
Mr Harrison: Since leaving the zoo in 2002, he has been advocating creativity through talks, workshops and articles

It certainly clicked with the American Creative Association (ACA), which is presenting him with the David Tanner Champion of Creativity Award tonight. The Association is holding its conference outside the US for the first time, in Singapore no less.

Mr Harrison and N Varaprasad, CEO of the National Library Board, will be the first Asians to receive the award.

'The award is given to individuals who not only show creativity in their own work but, more essentially, are able to see creativity in others . . . and to champion these individuals especially in environments where such championing is tough,' says Kirpal Singh, associate professor of Literature and Creative Thinking at Singapore Management University.

Mr Singh is also the first non-American elected to the ACA's board of directors.

'Creativity and Design' is cited as Mr Harrison's job scope in his business card for his company, Bernard Harrison and Friends (BH&F). Since leaving the zoo in 2002, the renowned non-conformist has been advocating creativity through talks, workshops and articles - partly through his zoo consultancy, and partly through his use of his workshop technique in other non-zoology related industries, such as tourism. His sudden departure from the zoo - where he'd been working for 29 years - launched him into the world of managing his own business, which he'll admit he isn't very good at.

'My principle partner (his wife) and the general manager don't allow me to talk money with my clients, in fact,' he quips, 'So I hide behind my creativity.'

On the topic of venturing out on his own, Mr Harrison reveals that finally, BH&F is on stable ground with projects and consultancy work in India, Morocco, Pakistan, the Philippines, Zimbabwe and even Bulgaria.

The business had faltered in the beginning, he admits. 'The problem is, you don't get people building a zoo every day,' he says frankly. And then there was Rimba, the business venture that didn't work out. The proposal was for a safari-style restaurant on Sentosa, planned as a $15 million joint venture between BH&F and Sentosa Leisure Group. That was scuppered at the last minute when the group decided not to go ahead.

A consulting project in Chiang Mai, Thailand, incidentally, where Mr Harrison drew up the master plan for the city's night safari, had helped keep BH&F afloat. 'And the lucky thing is that I had a good network of contacts, globally, as I used to attend conferences and so on,' says Mr Harrison, who also sits on several international boards related to zoos and wildlife.

Now though, projects are coming in, as zoos look set to continue to be chief attractions in the major cities even if there was previously a debate on their relevance in the 21st century.

'Ninety per cent are miserable though, with horrible conditions for the animals,' admits Mr Harrison, citing Singapore, North America, Northern Europe and Australia as having the best zoos. 'A good zoo will be like Club Med, and a bad zoo like a prison, for the animals,' he says.

But perhaps soon, the situation could change for the better, especially in Asia. The two projects in India he's consulting for, a zoo in Delhi and another in Maharashtra state, could well signal a positive change in how zoos are built. In China too, authorities are moving on the path of enlightenment, as Mr Harrison has been asked to give a workshop on master planning for zoos this year.

The reason why BH&F is called the way it is, is that Mr Harrison works only with friends - people he knows - which is a network of some 60 consultants around the world, all of whom are specialists in their own field, from IT designers to landscape architects.

'We are the epitome of a global company . . . I'll tender for a job, and put together a team for it, and if we get it, we'll come together in that city where the job is to brainstorm,' he explains. 'Business and design workshops are held simultaneously, and we also engage the local government to come up with a final business plan and concept.' And if you'd like to know, managing a group of consultants isn't an easy task, he adds.

Creativity for Mr Harrison - who has a masters in design, incidentally - was first expressed through Singapore's Zoo and Night Safari. The Night Safari idea, in fact, he credits to the late Lyn de Alwis, the former director of Sri Lanka's Colombo Zoo, who had come up with the idea, and who had helped Singapore design it.

Now, Mr Harrison is making a natural progression from creating great environments for animals in captivity to creating environments where human minds can be freer to roam. And in case you want to know which animal he's rooting for to become Singapore Zoo's next mascot, it'll be an orang utan; even if he and Ah Meng didn't really get along, he divulges.

BT: Draw of the artistic dollar

           

Business Times - 29 Feb 2008


  Draw of the artistic dollar

Regional auction houses make beeline for Singapore as market for contemporary South-east Asian art grows, reports PARVATHI NAYAR    

CAN Singapore become the hub for South-east Asian (SEA) art? It's almost a redundant question. Many regional auction houses already view Singapore as the key centre for contemporary SEA art, and are setting up auctions here. The bullish sentiment is bolstered by this weekend's art offerings, when Jakarta-based Masterpiece Auction House will hold its inaugural SEA art auctions in Singapore. It is one of three contemporary art auctions being held here by Masterpiece - the others being Indonesian and Chinese - where about 400 artworks will go under the hammer, with an estimated $10 million to $20 million worth of sales.

Masterpiece follows in the footsteps of two other auction houses which have set up offices here, Larasati Auctioneers (2003) and Borobudur Auction (2005). 'Today, Singapore is not just the marketplace for SEA art, it's also the market,' says Valentine Willie, adviser to Borobudur. He put together one of Singapore's largest auctions of SEA contemporary art last year for Borobudur; it included new media like photography, and netted about $2.8 million in sales.

'The market in Singapore has changed,' asserts Benny Oenardi Raharjo, Masterpiece president and director. 'I have been studying the SEA art auction market here for the past four years. Initially, the interest was in the old Dutch and Indonesian masters, and 70 per cent of the buyers were from Indonesia. Today, around 60 per cent of the buyers are from Singapore - and includes Indonesians based here, expats and Singaporeans.'

Daniel Komala, Larasati president-director, puts it this way: 'For contemporary SEA art auctions, Singapore is the stage, and the region is the audience - just like a Michael Jackson concert that is staged here, with ticket buyers from countries round the region.'

Big boys' exit

All of which suggests a healthy market here, but clouding the rosy picture is the fact that the big boys have stopped holding their SEA art auctions in Singapore. Sotheby's and Christie's have consolidated their sales of SEA contemporary and modern art with their other Asian sales in Hong Kong. Both, however, continue to have offices and previews in Singapore. But 'we aren't moving to Hong Kong because there aren't enough collectors here, but because it fits with our corporate strategy', says Hong Kong-based Quek Chin Yeow, deputy chairman of Sotheby's Asia. He points to how well sales have grown since SEA contemporary art was first introduced in their Singapore auctions, from $75,000 in 1996 to $1.1 million in 2005 to $3 million in 2007.

The move to Hong Kong gives SEA contemporary art a global platform, and allows for more cross-selling opportunities. 'Our slogan is that we source globally and sell centrally,' says Mr Quek, giving an example from the 1980s, when the Japanese were the largest buyers of Impressionist art but the auctions stayed in New York and London. Globalisation is so prevalent that Mr Quek is 'sure the serious Singapore-based buyers of South-east Asian art will come to Hong Kong for the auctions'. The litmus test will be Sotheby's first SEA pictures auction there - the Spring Sale in April 2008 - where the contemporary SEA paintings account for 94 lots, and is expected to fetch more than HK$7.81 million (S$1.4 million).

As for Christie's, specialist of SEA pictures Keong Ruoh Ling says that since the move to Hong Kong, sales for the SEA category has appreciated steadily and the market expanded beyond its immediate region.

For the larger cause of contemporary SEA art, the move to Hong Kong by the big players is no bad thing, for it introduces the art to a very different clientele. As Mr Willie observes, these collectors may have come to look at Chinese contemporary or jewels or watches, but could pop into the SEA auctions and think, 'Not bad lah - and quite cheap also!'

Meanwhile, back in Singapore, Ms Keong says that the influx of regional houses conducting SEA contemporary auctions 'is a direct result of the vacuum that resulted' with the exit of Christie's six years ago and Sotheby's last year.

Sophisticated market

Ironically, it was Christie's and Sotheby's that educated the market here about auctions and SEA art. When they left, they left behind a sophisticated market. And let's face it, says Mr Willie, 'their moving out has freed up the market here'. Mr Komala sees in this situation an opportunity to take on the big boys for a healthy slice of the market. He grins: 'You can't win the war but you can win some battles.'

SEA art collectors here such as Ong Say How are delighted that more contemporary SEA art auctions will happen locally. Dr Ong - who has been buying contemporary Indonesian art from regional auction houses since 2006 - says that the entry of Masterpiece into the SEA contemporary art market here will 'inject healthy and positive competition in the local auction scene'.

Henry Nangoy, a Singapore-based businessman in the chemical industry, says: 'With auction houses like Masterpiece coming to Singapore, it is easier and more accessible for us Singapore-based collectors to see the artworks and attend the auctions first-hand. It's definitely preferable to bidding over the phone.'

It is because he has found similar grassroots support in Singapore that Mr Komala set up offices here. 'Initially, I needed the Indonesian buyers here, but the past few auctions have seen only 30 per cent Indonesians in my sales rooms.'

But it's not just Singapore collectors, 'the growing expat community makes Singapore more interesting, especially as a gateway to a bigger market'.

Mr Willie says that, at their inaugural SEA contemporary art auction last year, the most expensive lot was bought by a Singaporean collector, and that overall, 35 per cent of the buyers were Singaporean.

With the arts infrastructure here improving, thanks to specialist art storage facilities and art movers, not to mention Singapore's moves to increase its population, or initiatives such as the F1 races and the integrated resorts, the market can only get bigger.

SEA contemporary art is a late entrant to the booming market that has grown for Asian contemporary art, with the Chinese and Indians already achieving high price points. But the latter could work well for SEA contemporary, as collectors are always looking for other, cheaper entry points into the market. 'It will be our time soon,' says Mr Willie confidently.

For sure, the SEA market is catching up. I Nyoman Masriadi's Jangan Tanya Saya Tanya Presiden set a world auction record for a contemporary SEA painting, when it sold for $360,000 at the Sotheby's auction here in September 2007.

Borobudur director John Andreas says that in the immediate future, 'the SEA contemporary scene will be dominated by artists like Agus Suwage, Handiwirman, Putu Sutawijaya and Masriadi from Indonesia; Nona Garcia and Winner Jumalon from Philippines, and Ahmad Zaki Anwar from Malaysia'.

So how do contemporary Singapore artists fare in the auctions? They have yet to become a dominant force, though the upcoming Masterpiece auction does feature a few such as Jensen Ee, Chua Boon Kee and Yeo Chee Kiong. Mr Komala says: 'The problem that Singapore artists face is that they get too little exposure. You have to be seen, to get a following and collector base.' In this respect, the greater number of SEA auctions here might well provide a platform for local artists.

As for the auction houses themselves, the increasing competition is good for business, say the players, in a mixture of truth and diplomacy. Mr Komala's dream, for example, is to build Larasati into an Asian equivalent of Christie's and Sotheby's, and he already has expansion plans into Amsterdam, Australia and Hong Kong. 'I can't do it alone. For the industry to become a strong one, you need good healthy competition and more people coming into the industry.'

The auction houses do try and differentiate themselves, based on the connoisseurship of their panel of experts in selecting the works for auctions. Mr Willie, for instance, says that he curated last year's auction in a way that was 'thematic, that gave audiences a sense of the issues that artists are dealing with here'. 'In our auctions, we don't emphasise the specific SEA country that the artist comes from, collectors focus on the art, and in this way, we encourage cross-buying.'

Increasing value

Sub-prime and liquidity crises don't appear to faze the auctioneers. Irrespective of how Masterpiece's debut auctions fare, then, all three auction houses currently conducting SEA contemporary art auctions here, plan to continue with two auctions each over the course of the year. Mr Raharjo says: 'Investors here now have diversified portfolios to include art. The value of SEA contemporary is only going up. Take, say, a Ugo Untoro work that sold for $5,000 two months ago; now - within a span of two months - it is fetching 10 times that amount in the auctions.'

Mr Komala says that in terms of market sustainability in tighter financial conditions, 'it's not the number of auction houses entering the market that matters, it's the number of sales you do'. 'You have to be realistic, and not exhaust the market beyond its capacity.'

As Singapore-based collector Dr Ong sums it up, art is increasingly seen here as an investment opportunity and a viable option to stocks. With SEA art riding on the wave of global popularity for contemporary Asian art, and given Singapore's fantastic economic infrastructure, it seems likely that the market here for SEA contemporary can only grow.

Previews for the Masterpiece auction, today, 11am to 8pm, Ballroom at Sheraton Towers, Scotts Road. The Indonesian and Chinese contemporary art auctions will be held tomorrow (March 1), 11am and 1.30pm respectively; the South-east Asian modern & contemporary art auction on March 2, 11am; at the Ballroom, Sheraton Towers

 

            

Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved. 

 


BT: More to Zouk than young revellers

              
Published February 29, 2008
NIGHT OUT
More to Zouk than young revellers
 

 

By CHRISTOPHER LIM   

       

AT lunchtime on Monday, party club Zouk was alive and buzzing, which is unusual in itself. But every Chinese New Year for the past 13 years, the established nightlife joint has thrown a reunion lunch for the old people from Tanjong Pagar GRC, including those from the Tiong Bahru Befriender Service.

     
Nightspot with a difference: The more than a hundred elderly people present loved every minute of Zouk's Chinese New Year reunion meal this year 

The sight of the main Zouk dancefloor decked out for Chinese New Year is a sight to behold. It's also something many people will never get to see, which is a shame, because it shows a very warm and welcoming side of the club. It's not just a place for dancing deliriously and drinking copiously, though that's undeniably its forte.

And this annual occasion also showed that Zouk has a great team of staff. The way everyone pitched in enthusiastically for entertainment and organisation demonstrated that this wasn't some fiat imposed from lofty upper management. Night staff like bouncers and managers who wouldn't have reported to work for many more hours were on stage singing and dancing.

It will be hard to look at the Zouk staff the same way ever again, which is far from a bad thing, because it's always gratifying to be able to humanise people you'd otherwise only deal with in crowded quarters, at the admission queue or squeezing towards the bar to place an order.

The more than a hundred elderly people present loved every minute of the attention and entertainment. These were folk used to living alone in one-room government flats and subsisting on public subsidies, so the eight-course reunion lunch probably felt to them like the equivalent of splashing out on a night of wining and dining in private banquet rooms with vintage champagne. On top of that, cheques totalling $60,000 were presented, which will go towards the meals of the old people for the whole year. And Zouk's staff took out from their own pockets to fill red packets for the elderly, along with goody bags filled with treats and daily necessities.

'I always look forward to go to Zouk because I feel very happy there,' says 96-year-old Mdm Lim Hup. 'I even danced there six years ago when I was 90. As long as I can walk I will never miss it.'

When was the last time you heard anyone talk about Zouk, or any other nightspot, in terms as unguardedly blissful?

It's safe to say that Zouk has earned its right to let its hair down and return to its normal partying mode.

And you can help the club welcome the weekend with a bang by swinging by its Facebook-themed Very Poked party tonight, named after the propensity of members of the social networking site to poke each other - virtually speaking, of course.

Social networking sites started as cyber spaces for the physical world to spill over into the virtual realm, so it's always amusing to see the traffic flow the other way, and have things that never existed in the real world suddenly pop up in the middle of a party. A prime example of this is the nonsensical Facebook practice of throwing sheep at your friends on the website.

In a tribute to the now infamous application, Zouk will have stuffed sheep at the Poked party, which you can count on to provoke more than a little hilarity. The Facebook theming won't stop there. Drinks will be served Booze Mail style, for those familiar with the Web application used for sending your friends virtual drinks.

Strike your pose for the real-life version of the Hotness application, nominate your friends for a SingTel popularity contest, and decorate a Subaru car in imitation of Facebook's Car Enthusiast application. Sounds like a hoot!

FT: Arctic vault to protect world seed collection

Arctic vault to protect world seed collection

By Fiona Harvey in London Environment Correspondent, FT.com site
Published: Jun 18, 2006

Work begins on Monday on a vault in the frozen earth of an Arctic mountain, off northern Norway, that will safeguard a vast collection of the world's seeds.

The vault will eventually hold 3m seed samples from every known variety of food crop, ranging from common staples such as wheat and potatoes to exotic specimens whose existence is endangered in the wild.

The collection will provide a seed collection of last resort - should a disaster such as an asteroid strike or extreme climate change result in mass crop extinctions, humans will be able to resurrect a species. It will focus initially on food crops, but not to the exclusion of other seeds.

Nicknamed the "doomsday vault ", the Svalbard International Seed Vault is the creation of the Global Crop Diversity Trust, a charity set up to protect plants, with the aid of the Norwegian government.

Conditions in Svalbard, within the Arctic circle, are considered ideal for preserving seeds, which will be kept behind blast-proof doors in watertight foil containers behind concrete walls a metre thick.

Some samples held in "black boxes " will be released only in the event that all other sources have been destroyed or exhausted.

However, Cary Fowler, executive secretary of the trust, said: "Crop diversity is imperilled not just by a cataclysmic event, such as a nuclear war, but also by natural disasters, accidents, mismanagement, and short-sighted budget cuts. "

Access to a diversity of plants was essential to the future of agriculture, because combining the genes of one plant with another gave rise to new varieties, he said. But many plant varieties are neglected and at risk of being lost, as farmers no longer grow them and the world's existing seed banks are not managed in a co-ordinated fashion.

Mr Cary said most seed banks were maintained by governments or research institutions that frequently reappraised budgets, putting them at risk of closure. There was insufficient international co-operation to save seeds, and many collections faced an uncertain future without Svalbard.

For instance, the potato blight that led to more than 1m deaths in Ireland in the 19th century still poses a problem, with recent outbreaks in Alaska and Bangladesh. The solution may lie in the seed banks in South America which could be used to develop blight-resistant varieties. But one of these gene banks nearly lost its entire potato collection recently when its refrigeration system broke down. Such seeds can now be held in Svalbard.

A study found that under conditions in Svalbard, for most food crops could remain viable for hundreds of years, while others, including grains, could survive for thousands of years.

NY Times: Birds Do It. Bees Do It. Dragons Don’t Need To.

Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or over the proper structure of the family. Or, more recently, regarding the morality of cloning. Whether we’re talking about raising bigger cattle or growing life-saving organs or trying to “live forever,” both sides like to stress their abilities to judge what is “natural.” Judging from Komodo dragons, lizards and sharks, the answer seems to be that for reproduction, almost anything goes.

And that is the point. Biology is about variation. Without variation, the world would be static and unchangeable, and species would gradually disappear as they failed to meet challenges like changing climates and environments. So as we continue our very necessary debates over ethical issues, let’s bear in mind that morality is a concept limited to our species. The natural world is a fuzzy place that doesn’t always accommodate our decidedly human need to find cut-and-dried categories.



===

Op-Ed Contributor

Birds Do It. Bees Do It. Dragons Don’t Need To.

 
Published: February 24, 2008
 

Chicago

Skip to next paragraph      
Katherine Streeter

 

     

DRAGONS and virgin births are the stuff of myth and religion. Except, that is, in Kansas, where they have recently come together in a way that should alter the way many of us look at nature and demonstrate the risks in our habit of using it to help us make ethical decisions.

Keepers at Wichita’s zoo got a surprise last year when they found developing eggs inside the Komodo dragon compound. Komodos are large rapacious lizards naturally found in Indonesia, but increasingly populating zoos around the world. Finding fertile embryos of dragons is a joyous occasion — there are only a few thousand of the lizards in the wild and captive breeding may be the only way to keep the species around.

But these eggs — two of which hatched a few weeks ago — were unusual: they developed from a female that had had no male of the species in close proximity for more than a decade. Judging from similar occurrences over the past two years in Britain, it appears that these lizards sometimes use a form of virgin birth in which eggs hatch without conception. The embryos are genetic clones of the mother.

Komodos — like many fish, amphibians and reptiles — have lots of reproductive tricks. For example, females can store sperm for a long time, tiding them over when conditions may be poor for reproduction. It’s possible that the Wichita dragon eggs could have been fertilized by the sperm from a male that was on site a long time ago. But DNA analysis of the “miracle embryos” from Britain showed that every bit of their DNA came from the females, and nobody should be surprised if this is also true of the Kansas dragons.

Virgin birth, known to biologists as parthenogenesis (from the Greek, “parthen” meaning virgin or maiden and “genesis,” beginning), has been seen in other species over the years. Some lizards occasionally produce offspring in this way. So do several species of fish, including a female hammerhead shark at the Henry Doorly Zoo in Omaha that produced offspring without a male last year.

The shark example is particularly striking because sharks are very primitive living fish, having shared a common ancestor with us over 400 million years ago. Biological cloning is not a recent invention of scientists; it is an ancient ability. And sharks, fish and lizards are probably only the tip of the iceberg. We know of virgin birth only in those rare instances when we’ve been lucky enough to see it. Nobody knows how common it is because there has been no systematic search for the phenomenon.

The big question these virgin births raise is this: If some females can get along without males, why does any species have males? The reason is simple. With virgin birth, hatchlings are simply genetic duplicates of the mother. In a world of clones, there would not be enough variation for populations to adapt. Virgin birth, then, is a great stopgap measure to ensure the survival of a species, but works against it in the long haul.

Cloning is one of many mechanisms species use to survive in a dangerous world. Indeed, the diversity of reproductive strategies seen in animals staggers the imagination. Some reptiles do not determine sexes genetically, but rely on different incubation temperatures to determine the development of males and females. Other creatures can actually switch sexes during their lifetimes, being born male and developing as females. Still others can switch sexes based on behavioral cues in the social group. There is no one way that creatures start development, grow and form sexes — there are many varied ways.

Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or over the proper structure of the family. Or, more recently, regarding the morality of cloning. Whether we’re talking about raising bigger cattle or growing life-saving organs or trying to “live forever,” both sides like to stress their abilities to judge what is “natural.” Judging from Komodo dragons, lizards and sharks, the answer seems to be that for reproduction, almost anything goes.

And that is the point. Biology is about variation. Without variation, the world would be static and unchangeable, and species would gradually disappear as they failed to meet challenges like changing climates and environments. So as we continue our very necessary debates over ethical issues, let’s bear in mind that morality is a concept limited to our species. The natural world is a fuzzy place that doesn’t always accommodate our decidedly human need to find cut-and-dried categories.

Neil Shubin, an associate dean at the University of Chicago and the provost of the Field Museum, is the author of “Your Inner Fish: A Journey Into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body.”

==

Utada Hikaru - Boku wa kuma - I am A Bear

                                                                                                                                                       
I am a Bear 
2006/ Japan                       / Colour / Animation / Comedy / Beta SP/ 3 min/ G         
                      Directed by: Tsuneo Goda

A day of "a pillow bear" starts. He wakes up to find that "she" is gone. Waiting for her alone, he reads a book, skateboards on a toy car, waters a plant and plays the guitar. Lonely, he says to himself, "I wonder if she is coming home…" and when she is home, he rushes to bed and turns into a pillow again.

               

                 
Michael Arias Tsuneo Goda
Tsuneo Goda started his directing career in TV commercials.
Developing DOMO-KUN, the station identity character for Japan Broadcasting Corporation, led him to move onto the field of animation. Goda is also know for his talent in illustration and children's books. By reflecting his feelings and experiences in every day's life, the titles all have a touch of reality.

English:

I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear
Not a car, a bear, bear, bear
I can't walk, but I can dance
I can't talk, but I can sing
I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear

I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear
I hate fighting, bear, bear, bear
My rivals are fried shrimps
I bet I was chocolate in my past life
I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear

Bonjour! Je m' appelle kuma.
Comment ca va?

I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear
I get sleepy in the winter, bear, bear, bear
At night I say "Goodnight, Mr Pillow"
In the morning I say "Good morning, Mr Pillow"
I'm a bear, bear, bear, bear

At night I say "Goodnight, Mr Pillow"
In the morning I say "Good morning, Mr Pillow"
I'm a bear, be, be, bear
Ar, ar, bear, bear

Romaji:

Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma
Kuruma ja nai yo kuma kuma kuma
Arukenai kedo odoreru yo
Shaberenai kedo utaeru yo
Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma

Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma
Kenka wa yada yo kuma kuma kuma
Raibaru wa ebi furai da yo
Zense wa kitto chokoreeto
Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma

Bonjour! Je m' appelle kuma.
Comment ca va ?

Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma
Fuyu wa nemui yo kuma kuma kuma
Yoru wa "oyasumi, makura-san"
Asa wa "ohayou, makura-san"
Boku wa kuma kuma kuma kuma

Yoru wa "oyasumi, makura-san"
Asa wa "ohayou, makura-san"
Boku wa kuma kuku kuma
Mama kuma kuma

NY Times: Making Economics Relevant Again


 

==

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/business/20leonhardt.html?_r=2&sq=leonhardt&st=nyt&oref=slogin&scp=2&pagewanted=print

 

 

The New York Times

 
 

Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

 


February 20, 2008

Economic Scene

Making Economics Relevant Again

It was only a decade ago that economics seemed to be an old and tired discipline. The field no longer had intellectual giants like John Maynard Keynes or Milton Friedman who were shaping public policy by the sheer force of their ideas. Instead, it was devolving into a technical discipline that was even less comprehensible than it was relevant.

Some Wall Street firms had become hesitant to hire Ph.D. economists, and the number of undergraduates majoring in the subject was plummeting. “A good deal of modern economic theory,” John Cassidy wrote in an article titled “The Decline of Economics” that appeared in The New Yorker in 1996, “simply doesn’t matter much.”

Over the last decade, however, economics has begun to get its groove back. Armed with newly powerful tools for analyzing data, economists have dug into real-world matters and tried to understand human behavior. Economists have again become storytellers, and, again, they matter.

They have explained why Americans don’t save enough money — and come up with clever ideas to increase savings. They have discovered that modest increases in the minimum wage don’t actually destroy many jobs — and thus made possible the recent state-by-state push to raise minimum wages. Since the mid-1990s, the number of undergraduates majoring in economics has risen sharply.

But there are more than a few economists who believe that the renaissance has come with a big downside. They argue that the new research often consists of cute findings — which inevitably get covered in the press — about trivial subjects, like game shows, violent movies or sports gambling. Economics may be popular again, but there still is no one like a modern-day Milton Friedman or John Maynard Keynes.

So when I recently set out to conduct my second annual survey of economists, I decided to try to uncover the next best thing. In its first incarnation, the survey simply asked for the names of the next generation of stars specializing in the economics of everyday life. This year, though, I went the other way — toward the big picture — and asked which economists were managing to do influential work on the crucial questions facing modern society.

Who, in other words, was using economics to make the world a better place?

I received dozens of diverse responses, but there was still a runaway winner. The small group of economists who work at the Jameel Poverty Action Lab at M.I.T., led by Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee, were mentioned far more often than anyone else.

Ms. Duflo, Mr. Banerjee and their colleagues have a simple, if radical, goal. They want to overhaul development aid so that more of it is spent on programs that actually make a difference. And they are trying to do so in a way that skirts the long-running ideological debate between aid groups and their critics.

“Surely the most important societal question economics can help answer is why so many people are crushingly poor and what can be done about it,” David Romer, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said. The macro issues (like how to build a democracy) remain maddeningly complex, Mr. Romer noted. But thanks in part to the poverty lab, we now know much more about how to improve daily life in the world’s poorest countries.

The basic idea behind the lab is to rely on randomized trials — similar to the ones used in medical research — to study antipoverty programs. This helps avoid the classic problem with the evaluation of aid programs: it’s often impossible to separate cause and effect. If aid workers start supplying textbooks to schools in one town and the students there start doing better, it could be because of the textbooks. Or it could be that the town also happened to hire a new school administrator.

In a randomized trial, researchers would choose a set of schools and then separate into them two groups. The groups would be similar in every respect except for the fact that one would receive new textbooks and one wouldn’t. With a test like this, as Vinod Thomas, the head of independent evaluation at the World Bank, says, “You can be much more accurate and much more clear about the effect of a program.”

The approach can sound cruel, because researchers knowingly deny help to some of the people they’re studying. But what, really, is the alternative? It’s not as if someone has offered to buy new textbooks for every child in the world. With a randomized study, you at least learn whether your aid money is well spent.

Ms. Duflo, who’s 35, and Mr. Banerjee, 46, came to economics from opposite ends of the intellectual spectrum. She was studying history at the École Normale Supérieure, one of the most prestigious colleges in

France

, when she decided that the more scientific approach of economics offered a better way to address global poverty. He dropped out of the similarly prestigious Indian Statistical Institute after two and a half months of studying math; he found the subject too abstract.

By 2003, they were both working on development at M.I.T. At the time, randomized trials were becoming more popular in the

United States

, but they were still fairly rare in the developing world. So along with Sendhil Mullainathan, a colleague, Ms. Duflo and Mr. Banerjee founded the lab. (It’s named for the father of an M.I.T. alumnus, who owned the exclusive right to sell Toyotas in

Saudi Arabia

.) Day to day, the lab is now run by Rachel Glennerster, who came from the International Monetary Fund, and it has become a magnet for some of the world’s best development economists, including Marianne Bertrand, Michael Kremer and Edward Miguel.

Mr. Kremer and two other economists, in fact, did the textbook experiment — and found that textbooks didn’t improve test scores or graduation rates in rural western

Kenya

. (The students were probably too diverse, in terms of preparation and even language, to be helped by a single curriculum.) On the other hand, another randomized trial in the same part of

Kenya

found that treating children for intestinal worms did lift school performance. That study has led to an expansion of deworming programs and, as Alan Krueger of

Princeton

says, is “probably improving millions of lives.”

Mr. Banerjee estimates, very conservatively, that $11 billion a year — out of roughly $100 billion in annual development aid worldwide — could be spent on programs that have been proved to work. Unfortunately, nowhere near $11 billion is being spent on such programs. “Right now, we don’t have a lot of things that have been taken up by the policy world,” he said. “But the policy lag is usually substantial. Now that we have a lot more results, I expect that in the next 10 years we will have a lot more impact.”

Mr. Banerjee and Ms. Duflo may not be a modern-day Keynes or Friedman. But they have still managed to do something rather profound. They have brought together the best of the new economics and the best of the old.

As has been the trend over the last decade, they have plunged into the world around them, refusing to accept the idea that economics is merely an extension of math. Yet no one can accuse them of working on some little problem that doesn’t matter.

E-mail: leonhardt@nytimes.com

Related

More on the Jameel Poverty Action Lab: The Study on Textbooks The Study on Deworming Other Randomized Trials Abhijit Banerjee's Web Site Esther Duflo's Web Site